
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,330 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 484.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 260W, a 190W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7800 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon PRO W7800
2023Why buy it
- ✅155.9% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌1378.7% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌271.4% higher power demand at 260W vs 70W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon PRO W7800
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,330 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 484.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 260W, a 190W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅155.9% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7800 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌1378.7% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌271.4% higher power demand at 260W vs 70W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7800 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Radeon PRO W7800?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 450 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 151 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 918 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 676 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 291 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 881 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 732 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 671 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 583 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 445 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 306 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon PRO W7800

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800
The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 27,180 — the Radeon PRO W7800 leads by 152.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2525 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 70 (Radeon PRO W7800) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 27,180+153% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4480+94% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 45.25 TFLOPS+568% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2525 MHz+72% |
| ROPs | 32 | 128+300% |
| TMUs | 72 | 280+289% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+15% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 70+289% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W7800 offers 433.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7800) — a 242.9% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7800. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7800) — the Radeon PRO W7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 32 GB+433% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 576 GB/s+243% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 260W — a 115.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7800). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-73% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+47% | 104.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7800 launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 93.2% less ($2330 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 10.9 (Radeon PRO W7800) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 483.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-93% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+483% | 10.9 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 31 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #28 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












