GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon PRO W7800

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W7800

2023Core: 1895 MHzBoost: 2525 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,330 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 484.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • Draws 70W instead of 260W, a 190W reduction.
  • Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7800 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Radeon PRO W7800

2023

Why buy it

  • 155.9% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 6 GB).
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
  • 1378.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,499 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • 271.4% higher power demand at 260W vs 70W.
  • 66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO W7800 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Yes. Radeon PRO W7800 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon PRO W7800 averages 155.9% more FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 27,180 vs 10,749 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon PRO W7800 is a 2023 card with FSR upscaling, while GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W7800 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 152.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 32 GB instead of 6 GB, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020), and a 5nm process instead of 8nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon PRO W7800 is about 1378.7% more expensive on MSRP at $2,499 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and you are getting 155.9% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data and 152.9% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon PRO W7800 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Radeon PRO W7800?
Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (70W vs 260W), and staying closer to $169 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon PRO W7800. The trade-off is that Radeon PRO W7800 currently gives you 152.9% higher G3D Mark and 155.9% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7800
1080p
low85 FPS225 FPS
medium72 FPS210 FPS
high60 FPS184 FPS
ultra40 FPS168 FPS
1440p
low74 FPS203 FPS
medium64 FPS171 FPS
high47 FPS142 FPS
ultra30 FPS134 FPS
4K
low27 FPS138 FPS
medium25 FPS115 FPS
high17 FPS94 FPS
ultra15 FPS87 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7800
1080p
low174 FPS619 FPS
medium149 FPS508 FPS
high118 FPS383 FPS
ultra87 FPS329 FPS
1440p
low129 FPS450 FPS
medium106 FPS371 FPS
high83 FPS300 FPS
ultra62 FPS247 FPS
4K
low74 FPS246 FPS
medium62 FPS206 FPS
high48 FPS184 FPS
ultra34 FPS151 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7800
1080p
low484 FPS918 FPS
medium387 FPS762 FPS
high322 FPS676 FPS
ultra242 FPS580 FPS
1440p
low363 FPS709 FPS
medium290 FPS583 FPS
high242 FPS505 FPS
ultra181 FPS427 FPS
4K
low242 FPS497 FPS
medium193 FPS411 FPS
high161 FPS350 FPS
ultra121 FPS291 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7800
1080p
low243 FPS881 FPS
medium210 FPS732 FPS
high171 FPS671 FPS
ultra144 FPS583 FPS
1440p
low185 FPS692 FPS
medium166 FPS577 FPS
high131 FPS512 FPS
ultra109 FPS445 FPS
4K
low104 FPS472 FPS
medium87 FPS405 FPS
high69 FPS366 FPS
ultra55 FPS306 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon PRO W7800

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

AMD

Radeon PRO W7800

The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 27,180 — the Radeon PRO W7800 leads by 152.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2525 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 70 (Radeon PRO W7800) with 72 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7800
G3D Mark Score
10,749
27,180+153%
Architecture
Ampere
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
8 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2304
4480+94%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS
45.25 TFLOPS+568%
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
2525 MHz+72%
ROPs
32
128+300%
TMUs
72
280+289%
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+15%
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB+200%
Ray Tracing Cores
18
70+289%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7800
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W7800 offers 433.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7800) — a 242.9% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7800. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7800) — the Radeon PRO W7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7800
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
32 GB+433%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
576 GB/s+243%
Bus Width
96-bit
256-bit+167%
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB+200%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7800
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7800
Encoder
NVENC (5th Gen)
VCN 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC (7th Gen)
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 260W — a 115.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7800). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7800
TDP
70W-73%
260W
Recommended PSU
300W-54%
650W
Power Connector
None
2x 8-pin
Length
160mm
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
153.6+47%
104.5
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7800 launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 93.2% less ($2330 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 10.9 (Radeon PRO W7800) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 483.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7800
MSRP
$169-93%
$2499
Performance per Dollar
63.6+483%
10.9
Codename
GA107
Navi 31
Release
February 2 2024
April 13 2023
Ranking
#252
#28