GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅364.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 804.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($119 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 364.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1184.2% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 837), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2023. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 more expensive on MSRP at $169 vs $119, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 804.3% (63.6 vs 7.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 837 points. Launch price was $3,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600's 837 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 1184.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6,144 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 96 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) with 72 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
G3D Mark Score	10,749+1184%	837
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2304	6144+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS	61.32 TFLOPS+805%
Boost Clock	1470 MHz	2495 MHz+70%
ROPs	32	192+500%
TMUs	72	384+433%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB	3 MB+30%
L2 Cache	2 MB	6 MB+200%
Ray Tracing Cores	18	96+433%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+1100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	168 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	96-bit	128-bit+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB	6 MB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600's 295W — a 123.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
TDP	70W-76%	295W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	153.6+5386%	2.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 launched at $119. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 was 29.6% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 808.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2023).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
MSRP	$169	$119-30%
Performance per Dollar	63.6+809%	7.0
Codename	GA107	Navi 31
Release	February 2 2024	April 13 2023
Ranking	#252	#26

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.