GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon R9 270X

CPU

GPU

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz

RTX family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon R9 270X

2013Boost: 1050 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon R9 270X Performance Spectrum

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

6 GB 70

10,749

+120.5%

GeForce GTX 770

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce GTX Titan

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

4,874

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon R9 270X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon R9 270X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅71.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 159.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 24.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon R9 270X

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
17.8% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 71.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 120.5% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 4,874), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 159.7% (63.6 vs 24.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon R9 270X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon R9 270X

The Radeon R9 270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,874 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon R9 270X's 4,874 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 120.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 270X uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270X). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.688 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270X). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 270X
G3D Mark Score	10,749+121%	4,874
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 1.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2304+80%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS+152%	2.688 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1470 MHz+40%	1050 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	72	80+11%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+642%	0.31 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 270X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 270X
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270X carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R9 270X) — a 6.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 270X. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270X. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270X) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 270X
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	168 GB/s	179.2 GB/s+7%
Bus Width	96-bit	256-bit+167%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 270X
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (11_1)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270X). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 270X).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 270X
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	VCE 1.0
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon R9 270X's 180W — a 88% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270X). Power connectors: None vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80 C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 270X
TDP	70W-61%	180W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	2x 6-pin
Length	160mm	241mm
Height	—	109mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80 C
Perf/Watt	153.6+467%	27.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Radeon R9 270X launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 15.1% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 24.5 (Radeon R9 270X) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 159.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 270X
MSRP	$169-15%	$199
Performance per Dollar	63.6+160%	24.5
Codename	GA107	Curacao
Release	February 2 2024	October 8 2013
Ranking	#252	#448

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 270X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.