GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon R9 A375

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅545.3% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 204.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 20.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌133.3% higher power demand at 70W vs 30W.
❌15900% longer card at 160mm vs 1mm.

Radeon R9 A375

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 70W, a 40W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 160mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Radeon R9 A375

2015

Why buy it

✅545.3% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 204.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 20.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 70W, a 40W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 160mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌133.3% higher power demand at 70W vs 30W.
❌15900% longer card at 160mm vs 1mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon R9 A375?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB averages 545.3% more FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 10,749 vs 1,024 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon R9 A375 is a 2015 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015, 949.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 512 MB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is about 244.9% more expensive on MSRP at $169 MSRP versus $49 MSRP, and you are getting 545.3% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data and 949.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 A375 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon R9 A375 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 A375 is 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM, 1,024 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 A375 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 A375
1080p
low	85 FPS	15 FPS
medium	72 FPS	10 FPS
high	60 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	3 FPS
1440p
low	74 FPS	10 FPS
medium	64 FPS	5 FPS
high	47 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	1 FPS
4K
low	27 FPS	4 FPS
medium	25 FPS	2 FPS
high	17 FPS	1 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon R9 A375

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 A375
1080p
low	174 FPS	42 FPS
medium	149 FPS	21 FPS
high	118 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	10 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	19 FPS
medium	106 FPS	10 FPS
high	83 FPS	7 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	6 FPS
medium	62 FPS	4 FPS
high	48 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	2 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon R9 A375

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 A375
1080p
low	484 FPS	46 FPS
medium	387 FPS	37 FPS
high	322 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	23 FPS
1440p
low	363 FPS	35 FPS
medium	290 FPS	28 FPS
high	242 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	17 FPS
4K
low	242 FPS	23 FPS
medium	193 FPS	18 FPS
high	161 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon R9 A375

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 A375
1080p
low	243 FPS	46 FPS
medium	210 FPS	37 FPS
high	171 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	23 FPS
1440p
low	185 FPS	35 FPS
medium	166 FPS	28 FPS
high	131 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	17 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	23 FPS
medium	87 FPS	18 FPS
high	69 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon R9 A375

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon R9 A375

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon R9 A375

The Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1015 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,024 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon R9 A375's 1,024 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 949.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 A375 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 640 (Radeon R9 A375). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 A375
G3D Mark Score	10,749+950%	1,024
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 1.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2304+260%	640
Boost Clock	1470 MHz+59%	925 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	72+80%	40

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 A375 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 A375
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 A375 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 A375
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+1100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	168 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	96-bit	128-bit+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 A375). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 A375
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12_0
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 A375). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 A375
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	VCE 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon R9 A375's 30W — a 80% difference. The Radeon R9 A375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Radeon R9 A375). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 160mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 A375
TDP	70W	30W-57%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	None
Length	160mm	1mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	153.6+350%	34.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 A375 launched at $49. The Radeon R9 A375 costs 71% less ($120 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 20.9 (Radeon R9 A375) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 204.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).