
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+582.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $131 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1111.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌15900% longer card at 160mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R9 M275X / M375
2014Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 160mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,575 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌77.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon R9 M275X / M375
2014Why buy it
- ✅+582.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $131 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1111.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 160mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌15900% longer card at 160mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,575 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌77.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon R9 M275X / M375?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M275X / M375 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 18 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 14 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon R9 M275X / M375

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Radeon R9 M275X / M375
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon R9 M275X / M375's 1,575 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 582.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+582% | 1,575 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+260% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+472% | 1.184 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+59% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 72+80% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+1337% | 0.16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon R9 M275X / M375's 75W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 160mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-7% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 160mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+631% | 21.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 launched at $300. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 43.7% less ($131 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.3 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1100% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-44% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+1100% | 5.3 |
| Codename | GA107 | Venus |
| Release | February 2 2024 | January 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #252 | #746 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












