G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅+133.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $480 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 795.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon R9 Nano

2015

Why buy it

✅Measures 152mm instead of 160mm, a 8mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,609 vs 10,749).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
284% HIGHER MSRP
$649 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Radeon R9 Nano

2015

Why buy it

✅+133.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $480 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 795.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅Measures 152mm instead of 160mm, a 8mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,609 vs 10,749).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
284% HIGHER MSRP
$649 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon R9 Nano?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,749 vs 4,609 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon R9 Nano is a 2015 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015, 133.2% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 2 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is about $480 cheaper on MSRP at $169 MSRP versus $649 MSRP, and you are getting 133.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 795.6%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon R9 Nano still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon R9 Nano is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $649 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 Nano Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 Nano
1080p
low	85 FPS	116 FPS
medium	72 FPS	99 FPS
high	60 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	49 FPS
1440p
low	74 FPS	93 FPS
medium	64 FPS	78 FPS
high	47 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	34 FPS
4K
low	27 FPS	33 FPS
medium	25 FPS	30 FPS
high	17 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	19 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon R9 Nano

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 Nano
1080p
low	174 FPS	207 FPS
medium	149 FPS	166 FPS
high	118 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	156 FPS
medium	106 FPS	124 FPS
high	83 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	98 FPS
medium	62 FPS	80 FPS
high	48 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	49 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon R9 Nano

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 Nano
1080p
low	484 FPS	207 FPS
medium	387 FPS	166 FPS
high	322 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	363 FPS	156 FPS
medium	290 FPS	124 FPS
high	242 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	242 FPS	104 FPS
medium	193 FPS	83 FPS
high	161 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon R9 Nano

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 Nano
1080p
low	243 FPS	196 FPS
medium	210 FPS	164 FPS
high	171 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	185 FPS	137 FPS
medium	166 FPS	117 FPS
high	131 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	82 FPS
medium	87 FPS	68 FPS
high	69 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	42 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon R9 Nano

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon R9 Nano

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon R9 Nano

The Radeon R9 Nano is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,609 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon R9 Nano's 4,609 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 133.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 Nano uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Nano). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8.192 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Nano). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 Nano
G3D Mark Score	10,749+133%	4,609
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 3.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2304	4096+78%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS	8.192 TFLOPS+21%
Boost Clock	1470 MHz+47%	1000 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	72	256+256%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+130%	1 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 Nano relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 Nano
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Nano has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Nano) — a 204.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 Nano. Bus width: 96-bit vs 4096-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 Nano
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+200%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM
Memory Bandwidth	168 GB/s	512 GB/s+205%
Bus Width	96-bit	4096-bit+4167%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (Radeon R9 Nano). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 Nano
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Nano). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs UVD 6.0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 Nano
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	VCE 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	UVD 6.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon R9 Nano's 175W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 550W (Radeon R9 Nano). Power connectors: None vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 152mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon R9 Nano
TDP	70W-60%	175W
Recommended PSU	300W-45%	550W
Power Connector	None	1x 8-pin
Length	160mm	152mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	153.6+484%	26.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 Nano launched at $649. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 74% less ($480 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7.1 (Radeon R9 Nano) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 795.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).