
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $410 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 38.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 240mm, a 80mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6800 across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Radeon RX 6800
2020Why buy it
- ✅112.6% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌242.6% HIGHER MSRP$579 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.1 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($579 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
- ❌50% longer card at 240mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon RX 6800
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $410 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 38.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 240mm, a 80mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅112.6% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6800 across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌242.6% HIGHER MSRP$579 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.1 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($579 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
- ❌50% longer card at 240mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6800 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Radeon RX 6800?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 83 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 84 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 901 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 734 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 637 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 496 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 691 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 248 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 641 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 547 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 434 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 243 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon RX 6800

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon RX 6800
Radeon RX 6800
The Radeon RX 6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,056 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon RX 6800's 22,056 — the Radeon RX 6800 leads by 105.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6800 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 6800). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2105 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 60 (Radeon RX 6800) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 22,056+105% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3840+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS+139% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2105 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 72 | 240+233% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+207% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 60+233% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6800 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6800 has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 6800 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6800) — a 204.8% advantage for the Radeon RX 6800. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 6800) — the Radeon RX 6800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 512 GB/s+205% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 6800). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 6800's 250W — a 112.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6800). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-72% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+74% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6800 launched at $579. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 70.8% less ($410 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 38.1 (Radeon RX 6800) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 66.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-71% | $579 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+67% | 38.1 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 21 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #252 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












