
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6800M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $430 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 186.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 22.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 145W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6800M across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Radeon RX 6800M
2021Why buy it
- ✅63.5% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌254.4% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.2 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌107.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 70W.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon RX 6800M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $430 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 186.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 22.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 145W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅63.5% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6800M across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌254.4% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.2 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌107.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6800M better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Radeon RX 6800M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 69 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 399 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 449 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 150 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 399 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 449 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 150 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon RX 6800M

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon RX 6800M
Radeon RX 6800M
The Radeon RX 6800M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2116 MHz to 2390 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 145W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,295 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon RX 6800M's 13,295 — the Radeon RX 6800M leads by 23.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6800M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6800M). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.24 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800M). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2390 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 40 (Radeon RX 6800M) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 13,295+24% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 12.24 TFLOPS+81% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2390 MHz+63% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 160+122% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+360% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 40+122% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6800M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6800M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6800M has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 6800M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6800M) — a 128.6% advantage for the Radeon RX 6800M. Bus width: 96-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6800M) — the Radeon RX 6800M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 384 GB/s+129% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 192-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6800M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6800M). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 6800M's 145W — a 69.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6800M). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-52% | 145W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+68% | 91.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6800M launched at $599. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 71.8% less ($430 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 22.2 (Radeon RX 6800M) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 186.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6800M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-72% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+186% | 22.2 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 22 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | May 31 2021 |
| Ranking | #252 | #193 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












