
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 49.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 190W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 240mm, a 80mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7700 across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 7700
2023Why buy it
- ✅75.6% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌165.7% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 49.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 190W vs 70W.
- ❌50% longer card at 240mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon RX 7700
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 49.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 190W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 240mm, a 80mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅75.6% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7700 across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌165.7% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 49.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 190W vs 70W.
- ❌50% longer card at 240mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7700 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Radeon RX 7700?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 75 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 838 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 684 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 600 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 498 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 520 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 240 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 465 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 189 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon RX 7700

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon RX 7700
Radeon RX 7700
The Radeon RX 7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,146 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon RX 7700's 22,146 — the Radeon RX 7700 leads by 106%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7700 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7700). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 20.48 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7700). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7700) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 22,146+106% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 20.48 TFLOPS+202% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2600 MHz+77% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 128+78% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+360% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 32+78% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7700 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7700 has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 7700 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 624 GB/s (Radeon RX 7700) — a 271.4% advantage for the Radeon RX 7700. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 624 GB/s+271% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7700). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 7700's 190W — a 92.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7700). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-63% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+32% | 116.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7700 launched at $449. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 62.4% less ($280 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 49.3 (Radeon RX 7700) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 29% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-62% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+29% | 49.3 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 33 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #140 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












