GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon RX 7700 XT

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 7700 XT

2023Core: 1435 MHzBoost: 2544 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $280 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
  • Delivers 26.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 50.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • Draws 70W instead of 245W, a 175W reduction.
  • Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7700 XT across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7700 XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Radeon RX 7700 XT

2023

Why buy it

  • 104.0% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
  • 165.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $449 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 50.5 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • 250% higher power demand at 245W vs 70W.
  • 66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 7700 XT better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Yes. Radeon RX 7700 XT is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon RX 7700 XT averages 104.0% more FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 22,654 vs 10,749 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 7700 XT is a 2023 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 7700 XT is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 110.8% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 6 GB, better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of DLSS Super Resolution, and a 5nm process instead of 8nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon RX 7700 XT is about 165.7% more expensive on MSRP at $449 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and you are getting 104.0% more estimated average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data and 110.8% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon RX 7700 XT is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Radeon RX 7700 XT?
Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (70W vs 245W), and staying closer to $169 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon RX 7700 XT. The trade-off is that Radeon RX 7700 XT currently gives you 110.8% higher G3D Mark and 104.0% more estimated average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX 7700 XT
1080p
low109 FPS176 FPS
medium92 FPS155 FPS
high77 FPS139 FPS
ultra45 FPS119 FPS
1440p
low95 FPS147 FPS
medium81 FPS119 FPS
high59 FPS106 FPS
ultra34 FPS96 FPS
4K
low30 FPS89 FPS
medium28 FPS74 FPS
high19 FPS57 FPS
ultra16 FPS50 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX 7700 XT
1080p
low174 FPS532 FPS
medium149 FPS452 FPS
high118 FPS354 FPS
ultra87 FPS298 FPS
1440p
low129 FPS367 FPS
medium106 FPS304 FPS
high83 FPS245 FPS
ultra62 FPS208 FPS
4K
low74 FPS165 FPS
medium62 FPS138 FPS
high48 FPS113 FPS
ultra34 FPS89 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX 7700 XT
1080p
low484 FPS892 FPS
medium387 FPS723 FPS
high322 FPS627 FPS
ultra242 FPS510 FPS
1440p
low363 FPS691 FPS
medium290 FPS555 FPS
high242 FPS470 FPS
ultra181 FPS382 FPS
4K
low242 FPS480 FPS
medium193 FPS388 FPS
high161 FPS319 FPS
ultra121 FPS255 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX 7700 XT
1080p
low243 FPS793 FPS
medium210 FPS694 FPS
high171 FPS624 FPS
ultra144 FPS510 FPS
1440p
low185 FPS626 FPS
medium166 FPS547 FPS
high131 FPS468 FPS
ultra109 FPS382 FPS
4K
low104 FPS423 FPS
medium87 FPS380 FPS
high69 FPS332 FPS
ultra55 FPS255 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon RX 7700 XT

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

AMD

Radeon RX 7700 XT

The Radeon RX 7700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 25 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1435 MHz to 2544 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,654 points. Launch price was $449.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon RX 7700 XT's 22,654 — the Radeon RX 7700 XT leads by 110.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7700 XT uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3,456 (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 35.17 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2544 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 54 (Radeon RX 7700 XT) with 72 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX 7700 XT
G3D Mark Score
10,749
22,654+111%
Architecture
Ampere
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
8 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2304
3456+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS
35.17 TFLOPS+419%
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
2544 MHz+73%
ROPs
32
96+200%
TMUs
72
216+200%
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+207%
0.75 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
18
54+200%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7700 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7700 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX 7700 XT
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7700 XT has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 7700 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 7700 XT) — a 157.1% advantage for the Radeon RX 7700 XT. Bus width: 96-bit vs 192-bit.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX 7700 XT
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
12 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
432 GB/s+157%
Bus Width
96-bit
192-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX 7700 XT
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7700 XT).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX 7700 XT
Encoder
NVENC (5th Gen)
VCN 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC (7th Gen)
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 7700 XT's 245W — a 111.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 700W (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 55°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX 7700 XT
TDP
70W-71%
245W
Recommended PSU
300W-57%
700W
Power Connector
None
2x 8-pin
Length
160mm
267mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
55°C-27%
Perf/Watt
153.6+66%
92.5
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7700 XT launched at $449. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 62.4% less ($280 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 50.5 (Radeon RX 7700 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 25.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX 7700 XT
MSRP
$169-62%
$449
Performance per Dollar
63.6+26%
50.5
Codename
GA107
Navi 32
Release
February 2 2024
August 25 2023
Ranking
#252
#58