
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $380 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 49.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 260W, a 190W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 276mm, a 116mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900 GRE across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7900 GRE is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
2023Why buy it
- ✅132.8% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌224.9% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 49.5 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌271.4% higher power demand at 260W vs 70W.
- ❌72.5% longer card at 276mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon RX 7900 GRE
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $380 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 49.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 260W, a 190W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 276mm, a 116mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅132.8% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900 GRE across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7900 GRE is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌224.9% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 49.5 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌271.4% higher power demand at 260W vs 70W.
- ❌72.5% longer card at 276mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7900 GRE better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Radeon RX 7900 GRE?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 83 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 144 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 900 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 746 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 662 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 565 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 571 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 340 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 276 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 350 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 278 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon RX 7900 GRE

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 27 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1287 MHz to 2245 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,162 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon RX 7900 GRE's 27,162 — the Radeon RX 7900 GRE leads by 152.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7900 GRE uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5,120 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 45.98 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2245 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 80 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 27,162+153% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 5120+122% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 45.98 TFLOPS+579% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2245 MHz+53% |
| ROPs | 32 | 160+400% |
| TMUs | 72 | 320+344% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 2.5 MB+9% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 80+344% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 GRE is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7900 GRE relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900 GRE has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 7900 GRE offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900 GRE) — a 242.9% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 GRE. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900 GRE) — the Radeon RX 7900 GRE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 576 GB/s+243% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 7900 GRE).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 7900 GRE's 260W — a 115.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 750W (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 276mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-73% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-60% | 750W |
| Power Connector | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 276mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 60°C-20% |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+47% | 104.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7900 GRE launched at $549. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 69.2% less ($380 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 49.5 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 28.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-69% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+28% | 49.5 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 31 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | July 27 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #29 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












