
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 9070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $380 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 46.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 220W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 9070 across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 9070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 9070
2025Why buy it
- ✅98.2% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌224.9% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 46.2 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌214.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 70W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon RX 9070
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $380 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 46.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 220W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅98.2% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 9070 across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 9070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌224.9% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 46.2 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌214.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 70W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 9070 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 75 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 450 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 77 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 900 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 745 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 562 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 271 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 809 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 703 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 641 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 428 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 286 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon RX 9070

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon RX 9070
Radeon RX 9070
The Radeon RX 9070 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 6 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1330 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,380 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon RX 9070's 25,380 — the Radeon RX 9070 leads by 136.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 9070 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3,584 (Radeon RX 9070). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 36.13 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 9070). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 56 (Radeon RX 9070) with 72 Tensor cores vs 112.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 25,380+136% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3584+56% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 36.13 TFLOPS+433% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2520 MHz+71% |
| ROPs | 32 | 128+300% |
| TMUs | 72 | 224+211% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 56+211% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 112+56% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 9070 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 9070 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 9070 has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 9070 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 640 GB/s (Radeon RX 9070) — a 281% advantage for the Radeon RX 9070. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 9070) — the Radeon RX 9070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 640 GB/s+281% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 9070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 9070). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs Dual Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (Radeon RX 9070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | Dual Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 9070's 220W — a 103.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (Radeon RX 9070). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-68% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+33% | 115.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 9070 launched at $549. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 69.2% less ($380 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 46.2 (Radeon RX 9070) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 37.7% better value. The Radeon RX 9070 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-69% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+38% | 46.2 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 48 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | March 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #252 | #39 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












