
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+174.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 143.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 26.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,922 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.1 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
2018Why buy it
- ✅+174.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 143.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 26.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,922 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.1 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 44 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2018. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,922 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870's 3,922 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 174.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 uses Vega, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,280 (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1011 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+174% | 3,922 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Vega |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+80% | 1280 |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+45% | 1011 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870) — a 6.7% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870. Bus width: 96-bit vs 1024-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s+7% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 1024-bit+967% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870's 65W — a 7.4% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 65W-7% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 160mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+155% | 60.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 launched at $150. The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 costs 11.2% less ($19 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 26.1 (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 143.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $150-11% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+144% | 26.1 |
| Codename | GA107 | Vega Kaby Lake-G |
| Release | February 2 2024 | January 7 2018 |
| Ranking | #252 | #427 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












