GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon RX590 GME

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX590 GME

2018Core: 1469 MHzBoost: 1545 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon RX590 GME Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon RX590 GME FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon RX590 GME: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • +28.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $4 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $173 MSRP).
  • Delivers 31.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 48.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $173 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX590 GME across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon RX590 GME

2018

Why buy it

  • 10.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,349 vs 10,749).
  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
  • Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 2.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $173 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 48.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($173 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX590 GME is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce RTX 3050 6GB instead at 10,749 vs 8,349, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 12nm, 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2018. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $173, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 31.8% (63.6 vs 48.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon RX590 GME still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon RX590 GME Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

AMD

Radeon RX590 GME

The Radeon RX590 GME is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,349 points. Launch price was $279.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon RX590 GME's 8,349 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 28.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX590 GME uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX590 GME). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX590 GME). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1545 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX590 GME
G3D Mark Score
10,749+29%
8,349
Architecture
Ampere
GCN 4.0
Process Node
8 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2304
2304
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS
7.119 TFLOPS+5%
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
1545 MHz+5%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
72
144+100%
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+311%
0.56 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX590 GME leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX590 GME
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX590 GME carries 8 GB. Radeon RX590 GME gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 128-bit on the Radeon RX590 GME.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX590 GME
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
8 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
96-bit
128-bit+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX590 GME). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX590 GME
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.0
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX590 GME). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX590 GME).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX590 GME
Encoder
NVENC (5th Gen)
VCE 3.4
Decoder
NVDEC (7th Gen)
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX590 GME's 175W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Radeon RX590 GME). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX590 GME
TDP
70W-60%
175W
Recommended PSU
300W-40%
500W
Power Connector
None
8-pin
Length
160mm
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
153.6+222%
47.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Radeon RX590 GME launched at $173. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 2.3% cheaper ($4 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48.3 (Radeon RX590 GME) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 31.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2018).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon RX590 GME
MSRP
$169-2%
$173
Performance per Dollar
63.6+32%
48.3
Codename
GA107
Polaris 30
Release
February 2 2024
November 15 2018
Ranking
#252
#285

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.