
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+662.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 346.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 14.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 15W.
- ❌15900% longer card at 160mm vs 1mm.
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 70W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 160mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,410 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.2 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
2020Why buy it
- ✅+662.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 346.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 14.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 70W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 160mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 15W.
- ❌15900% longer card at 160mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,410 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.2 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 16 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 16 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.


Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
The Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2020. It features the Vega architecture. The boost clock speed is 2100 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,410 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C's 1,410 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 662.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C uses Vega, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 512 (Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2100 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+662% | 1,410 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Vega |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+350% | 512 |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2100 MHz+43% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12_1 (Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 1.0 (Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 1.0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 1.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C's 15W — a 129.4% difference. The Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 160mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 15W-79% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 160mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+63% | 94.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C launched at $99. The Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C costs 41.4% less ($70 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 14.2 (Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 347.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $99-41% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+348% | 14.2 |
| Codename | GA107 | Vega |
| Release | February 2 2024 | January 7 2020 |
| Ranking | #252 | #545 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













