
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

RadeonT 780M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+51.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 15W.
RadeonT 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 70W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,098 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024RadeonT 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅+51.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 70W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,098 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than RadeonT 780M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RadeonT 780M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 319 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 77 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 38 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and RadeonT 780M

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RadeonT 780M
RadeonT 780M
The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RadeonT 780M's 7,098 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 51.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (RadeonT 780M) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+51% | 7,098 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+200% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 8.909 TFLOPS+32% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2900 MHz+97% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 72+50% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+820% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18+50% | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RadeonT 780M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT 780M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 129.4% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 15W-79% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 160mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 473.2+208% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












