G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 96), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅54.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅33.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (96 vs 72).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 54.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 38.7% in PassMark G3D (14,909 vs 10,749), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 8nm, and 24 vs 18 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2115 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,909 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile's 14,909 — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile leads by 38.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3,072 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.99 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2115 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 24 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) with 72 Tensor cores vs 96.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score	10,749	14,909+39%
Architecture	Ampere	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2304	3072+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS	12.99 TFLOPS+92%
Boost Clock	1470 MHz	2115 MHz+44%
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	72	96+33%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB	3 MB+30%
L2 Cache	2 MB	12 MB+500%
Ray Tracing Cores	18	24+33%
Tensor Cores	72	96+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile carries 8 GB. RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 52.4% advantage for the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 128-bit on the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	168 GB/s	256 GB/s+52%
Bus Width	96-bit	128-bit+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB	12 MB+500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC (Ada) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC (Ada). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	NVENC (Ada)
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	NVDEC (Ada)
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile's 50W — a 33.3% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP	70W	50W-29%
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85
Perf/Watt	153.6	298.2+94%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2023).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
MSRP	$169	—
Codename	GA107	AD107
Release	February 2 2024	March 21 2023
Ranking	#252	#155

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Search RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.