G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 70W instead of 115W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 160), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌52.4% longer card at 160mm vs 105mm.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

2023

Why buy it

✅85.5% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅122.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (160 vs 72).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Measures 105mm instead of 160mm, a 55mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌64.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 70W.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 70W instead of 115W, a 45W reduction.

Why buy it

✅85.5% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅122.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (160 vs 72).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Measures 105mm instead of 160mm, a 55mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 160), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌52.4% longer card at 160mm vs 105mm.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌64.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

So, is RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?

Yes. RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is clearly the better overall GPU here. RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU averages 85.5% more FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 25,267 vs 10,749 in G3D Mark. On top of that, RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is a 2023 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 135.1% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 6 GB, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of DLSS Super Resolution, and a 5nm process instead of 8nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and you are getting 85.5% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data and 135.1% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (70W vs 115W), and staying closer to $169 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU. The trade-off is that RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU currently gives you 135.1% higher G3D Mark and 85.5% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Benchmark Check

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
1080p
low	85 FPS	141 FPS
medium	72 FPS	122 FPS
high	60 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	73 FPS
1440p
low	74 FPS	113 FPS
medium	64 FPS	94 FPS
high	47 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	51 FPS
4K
low	27 FPS	50 FPS
medium	25 FPS	44 FPS
high	17 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	27 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
1080p
low	174 FPS	370 FPS
medium	149 FPS	316 FPS
high	118 FPS	250 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	213 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	277 FPS
medium	106 FPS	230 FPS
high	83 FPS	182 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	146 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	130 FPS
medium	62 FPS	111 FPS
high	48 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	68 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
1080p
low	484 FPS	826 FPS
medium	387 FPS	679 FPS
high	322 FPS	612 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	538 FPS
1440p
low	363 FPS	628 FPS
medium	290 FPS	510 FPS
high	242 FPS	451 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	391 FPS
4K
low	242 FPS	405 FPS
medium	193 FPS	323 FPS
high	161 FPS	264 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	209 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
1080p
low	243 FPS	287 FPS
medium	210 FPS	248 FPS
high	171 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	179 FPS
1440p
low	185 FPS	228 FPS
medium	166 FPS	200 FPS
high	131 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	142 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	140 FPS
medium	87 FPS	118 FPS
high	69 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	78 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,267 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 25,267 — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU leads by 135.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5,120 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 15.82 TFLOPS (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1500 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 40 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) with 72 Tensor cores vs 160.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score	10,749	25,267+135%
Architecture	Ampere	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2304	5120+122%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS	15.82 TFLOPS+134%
Boost Clock	1470 MHz	1500 MHz+2%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	72	160+122%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB	5 MB+117%
L2 Cache	2 MB	48 MB+2300%
Ray Tracing Cores	18	40+122%
Tensor Cores	72	160+122%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has 12 GB. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — a 157.1% advantage for the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU. Bus width: 96-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48 MB (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	12 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	168 GB/s	432 GB/s+157%
Bus Width	96-bit	192-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB	48 MB+2300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	NVENC 8th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	NVDEC 5th Gen
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	H.264,H.265,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 115W — a 48.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 105mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
TDP	70W-39%	115W
Recommended PSU	300W-54%	650W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	105mm
Height	—	82mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85
Perf/Watt	153.6	219.7+43%