GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 428.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅58.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌1082.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 24,046 — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation leads by 123.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) with 72 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 24,046+124% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 6144+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 26.73 TFLOPS+295% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1560 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 192+167% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 6 MB+161% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 48+167% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 192+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 114.3% advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 160-bit on the RTX 4000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 360 GB/s+114% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 160-bit+67% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 0% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: None vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-60% | 750W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 343.5+124% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 91.5% cheaper ($1830 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 430% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-92% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+430% | 12.0 |
| Codename | GA107 | AD104 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #47 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and RTX 4000 Ada Generation
