
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 110W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 241mm, a 81mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅119.8% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 110W vs 70W.
- ❌50.6% longer card at 241mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 110W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 241mm, a 81mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅119.8% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 110W vs 70W.
- ❌50.6% longer card at 241mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 101 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 845 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 692 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 623 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 498 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 569 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 492 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 462 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 410 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 249 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,119 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 22,119 — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU leads by 105.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 72 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 22,119+106% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 6144+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 26.73 TFLOPS+295% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1665 MHz+13% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 192+167% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 6 MB+161% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 48+167% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 192+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has 12 GB. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 157.1% advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU. Bus width: 96-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 432 GB/s+157% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 192-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs AV1,H.265,H.264 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | AV1,H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 110W — a 44.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 160mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-36% | 110W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 150W-50% |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 160mm | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 201.1+31% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | — |
| Codename | GA107 | AD104 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #47 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












