
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 515.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,749 vs 20,669).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅+92.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌1082.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 515.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+92.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,749 vs 20,669).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌1082.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 48 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 465 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 288 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 113 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 208 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 43 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 20,669 — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation leads by 92.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) with 72 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 20,669+92% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 6144+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+183% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1560 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 192+167% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 6 MB+161% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 48+167% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 192+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — a 66.7% advantage for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation. Bus width: 96-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 280 GB/s+67% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 160-bit+67% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 70W — a 0% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Power connectors: None vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-60% | 750W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 295.3+92% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 91.5% less ($1830 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 10.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 517.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-92% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+517% | 10.3 |
| Codename | GA107 | AD104 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #71 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












