
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,831 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 740.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 7.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅171.0% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2266.9% HIGHER MSRP$4,000 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024RTX 5000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,831 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 740.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 7.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅171.0% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌2266.9% HIGHER MSRP$4,000 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 5000 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than RTX 5000 Ada Generation?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 53 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 583 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 482 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 491 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 911 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 748 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 674 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 581 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 435 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 101 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and RTX 5000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,269 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 30,269 — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation leads by 181.6%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2550 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 100 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) with 72 Tensor cores vs 400.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 30,269+182% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 12800+456% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 65.28 TFLOPS+864% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2550 MHz+73% |
| ROPs | 32 | 176+450% |
| TMUs | 72 | 400+456% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 12.5 MB+443% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 72 MB+3500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 100+456% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 400+456% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation offers 433.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — a 242.9% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 32 GB+433% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 576 GB/s+243% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 72 MB+3500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 250W — a 112.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-72% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 16-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+27% | 121.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation launched at $4000. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 95.8% less ($3831 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7.6 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 736.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-96% | $4000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+737% | 7.6 |
| Codename | GA107 | AD102 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #16 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












