G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX A4000H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX A4000H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $831 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 438.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 140W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 192), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

RTX A4000H

2021

Why buy it

✅63.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅166.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (192 vs 72).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌
491.7% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 140W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX A4000H is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 63.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 9.9% in PassMark G3D (11,815 vs 10,749), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2021. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $831 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 438.3% (63.6 vs 11.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. RTX A4000H still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX A4000H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RTX A4000H

The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX A4000H's 11,815 — the RTX A4000H leads by 9.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48 (RTX A4000H) with 72 Tensor cores vs 192.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX A4000H
G3D Mark Score	10,749	11,815+10%
Architecture	Ampere	Ampere
Process Node	8 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	2304	6144+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS	19.17 TFLOPS+183%
Boost Clock	1470 MHz	1560 MHz+6%
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	72	192+167%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB	6 MB+161%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores	18	48+167%
Tensor Cores	72	192+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A4000H supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX A4000H
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000H carries 8 GB. RTX A4000H gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) — a 166.7% advantage for the RTX A4000H. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 192-bit on the RTX A4000H. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000H) — the RTX A4000H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX A4000H
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	168 GB/s	448 GB/s+167%
Bus Width	96-bit	192-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX A4000H
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs None. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs None (RTX A4000H).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX A4000H
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	None
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	None
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	None

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX A4000H
TDP	70W-50%	140W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	241mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	153.6+82%	84.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 83.1% cheaper ($831 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 11.8 (RTX A4000H) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 439% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2021).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	RTX A4000H
MSRP	$169-83%	$1000
Performance per Dollar	63.6+439%	11.8
Codename	GA107	GA104
Release	February 2 2024	April 12 2021
Ranking	#252	#226

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Search RTX A4000H on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.