
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

RTX A4500
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX A4500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX A4500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX A4500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,530 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 412.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 224), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX A4500
2021Why buy it
- ✅54.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅211.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (224 vs 72).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌905.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,699 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX A4500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RTX A4500
The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX A4500's 21,094 — the RTX A4500 leads by 96.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1650 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 56 (RTX A4500) with 72 Tensor cores vs 224.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 21,094+96% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 7168+211% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 23.65 TFLOPS+249% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1650 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 72 | 224+211% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 7 MB+204% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 56+211% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 224+211% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) — a 166.7% advantage for the RTX A4500. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 192-bit on the RTX A4500. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6 MB (RTX A4500) — the RTX A4500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 448 GB/s+167% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 192-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 96.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-65% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+46% | 105.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the RTX A4500 launched at $1699. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 90.1% cheaper ($1530 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.4 (RTX A4500) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 412.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-90% | $1699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+413% | 12.4 |
| Codename | GA107 | GA102 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #252 | #68 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














