GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX A4500

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

RTX A4500

2021Core: 1050 MHzBoost: 1650 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX A4500 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX A4500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX A4500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,530 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 412.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RTX A4500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 224), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

RTX A4500

2021

Why buy it

  • 54.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 211.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (224 vs 72).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 905.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,699 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • 185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RTX A4500 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 54.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 96.2% in PassMark G3D (21,094 vs 10,749), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2021. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,530 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $1,699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 412.3% (63.6 vs 12.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. RTX A4500 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX A4500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

NVIDIA

RTX A4500

The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX A4500's 21,094 — the RTX A4500 leads by 96.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1650 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 56 (RTX A4500) with 72 Tensor cores vs 224.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRTX A4500
G3D Mark Score
10,749
21,094+96%
Architecture
Ampere
Ampere
Process Node
8 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
2304
7168+211%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS
23.65 TFLOPS+249%
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
1650 MHz+12%
ROPs
32
96+200%
TMUs
72
224+211%
L1 Cache
2.3 MB
7 MB+204%
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB+200%
Ray Tracing Cores
18
56+211%
Tensor Cores
72
224+211%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A4500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRTX A4500
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) — a 166.7% advantage for the RTX A4500. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 192-bit on the RTX A4500. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6 MB (RTX A4500) — the RTX A4500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRTX A4500
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+200%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
448 GB/s+167%
Bus Width
96-bit
192-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB+200%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRTX A4500
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRTX A4500
Encoder
NVENC (5th Gen)
7th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder
NVDEC (7th Gen)
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 96.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRTX A4500
TDP
70W-65%
200W
Recommended PSU
300W-33%
450W
Power Connector
None
8-pin
Length
160mm
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
153.6+46%
105.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the RTX A4500 launched at $1699. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 90.1% cheaper ($1530 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.4 (RTX A4500) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 412.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2021).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRTX A4500
MSRP
$169-90%
$1699
Performance per Dollar
63.6+413%
12.4
Codename
GA107
GA102
Release
February 2 2024
November 23 2021
Ranking
#252
#68

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.