
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅39.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌250% higher power demand at 70W vs 20W.
- ❌95.1% longer card at 160mm vs 82mm.
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 70W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 160mm, a 78mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX A500 Embedded GPU's 6,197 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 73.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.468 TFLOPS (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1335 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 16 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) with 72 Tensor cores vs 64.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+73% | 6,197 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+24% | 5.468 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+10% | 1335 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 72+13% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+15% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18+13% | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 72+13% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 128-bit on the RTX A500 Embedded GPU.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12_2 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 7th Gen (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX A500 Embedded GPU's 20W — a 111.1% difference. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 20W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 82mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 309.9+102% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | — |
| Codename | GA107 | GA107S |
| Release | February 2 2024 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #252 | #389 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














