
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

RTX A5500 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 165W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,749 vs 17,120).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 232), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX A5500 Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅+59.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅222.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (232 vs 72).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌135.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 70W.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024RTX A5500 Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 165W, a 95W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+59.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅222.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (232 vs 72).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,749 vs 17,120).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 232), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌135.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A5500 Mobile better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than RTX A5500 Mobile?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 391 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 159 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 80 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 770 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 616 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 578 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 193 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 90 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and RTX A5500 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RTX A5500 Mobile
RTX A5500 Mobile
The RTX A5500 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,120 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX A5500 Mobile's 17,120 — the RTX A5500 Mobile leads by 59.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX A5500 Mobile uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7,424 (RTX A5500 Mobile). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 22.27 TFLOPS (RTX A5500 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1500 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 58 (RTX A5500 Mobile) with 72 Tensor cores vs 232.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 17,120+59% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 7424+222% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 22.27 TFLOPS+229% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1500 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 72 | 232+222% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 7.3 MB+217% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 58+222% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 232+222% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A5500 Mobile supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5500 Mobile has 16 GB. The RTX A5500 Mobile offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4 MB (RTX A5500 Mobile) — the RTX A5500 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (RTX A5500 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A5500 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RTX A5500 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX A5500 Mobile's 165W — a 80.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (RTX A5500 Mobile). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-58% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+48% | 103.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | — |
| Codename | GA107 | GA103 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | March 22 2022 |
| Ranking | #252 | #110 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












