
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 323.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 167mm, a 7mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
2025Why buy it
- ✅126.2% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅288.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 72).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌1082.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 323.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 167mm, a 7mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅126.2% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅288.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 72).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌1082.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 549 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 571 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 401 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 407 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 217 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 80 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 577 MHz to 1432 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,020 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 30,020 — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition leads by 179.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 25.66 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1432 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) with 72 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 30,020+179% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 8960+289% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 25.66 TFLOPS+279% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+3% | 1432 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 72 | 280+289% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 8.8 MB+283% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 70+289% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 280+289% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 24 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 70W — a 0% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 167mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 72°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 428.9+179% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 91.5% less ($1830 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 15.0 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 324% better value. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-92% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+324% | 15.0 |
| Codename | GA107 | GB203 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #252 | #17 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












