
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $8,396 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1169.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 600W, a 530W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 304mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 across 24 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 752), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 6000 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX PRO 6000
2025Why buy it
- ✅207.8% more average FPS across 24 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅944.4% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (752 vs 72).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌4968% HIGHER MSRP$8,565 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌757.1% higher power demand at 600W vs 70W.
- ❌90% longer card at 304mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024RTX PRO 6000
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $8,396 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1169.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 600W, a 530W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 304mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅207.8% more average FPS across 24 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅944.4% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (752 vs 72).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 across 24 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 752), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 6000 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌4968% HIGHER MSRP$8,565 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌757.1% higher power demand at 600W vs 70W.
- ❌90% longer card at 304mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 6000 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 344 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 328 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 328 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 955 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 790 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 620 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 759 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 283 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 948 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 775 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 701 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 606 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 930 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 827 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 786 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 692 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 440 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and RTX PRO 6000

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000
The RTX PRO 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42,899 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX PRO 6000's 42,899 — the RTX PRO 6000 leads by 299.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX PRO 6000 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 24,064 (RTX PRO 6000). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 115.8 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 6000). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 188 (RTX PRO 6000) with 72 Tensor cores vs 752.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 42,899+299% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 24064+944% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 115.8 TFLOPS+1609% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2407 MHz+64% |
| ROPs | 32 | 176+450% |
| TMUs | 72 | 752+944% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 23.5 MB+922% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 128 MB+6300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 188+944% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 752+944% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 6000 has 48 GB. The RTX PRO 6000 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 960 GB/s (RTX PRO 6000) — a 471.4% advantage for the RTX PRO 6000. Bus width: 96-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 128 MB (RTX PRO 6000) — the RTX PRO 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 48 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 960 GB/s+471% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 384-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 128 MB+6300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 6000). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX PRO 6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX PRO 6000's 600W — a 158.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (RTX PRO 6000). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-88% | 600W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | 16-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 304mm |
| Height | — | 137mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+115% | 71.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 6000 launched at $8565. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 98% less ($8396 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.0 (RTX PRO 6000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1172% better value. The RTX PRO 6000 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-98% | $8565 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+1172% | 5.0 |
| Codename | GA107 | GB202 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | 2025 |
| Ranking | #252 | #608 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












