
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

RTX PRO 6000
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX PRO 6000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX PRO 6000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX PRO 6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $8,396 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1169.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 600W, a 530W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 304mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 752), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌RTX PRO 6000 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
RTX PRO 6000
2025Why buy it
- ✅212.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅944.4% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (752 vs 72).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌4968% HIGHER MSRP$8,565 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌757.1% higher power demand at 600W vs 70W.
- ❌90% longer card at 304mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX PRO 6000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RTX PRO 6000
The RTX PRO 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42,899 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX PRO 6000's 42,899 — the RTX PRO 6000 leads by 299.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX PRO 6000 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 24,064 (RTX PRO 6000). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 115.8 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 6000). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 188 (RTX PRO 6000) with 72 Tensor cores vs 752.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 42,899+299% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 24064+944% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 115.8 TFLOPS+1609% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2407 MHz+64% |
| ROPs | 32 | 176+450% |
| TMUs | 72 | 752+944% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 23.5 MB+922% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 128 MB+6300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 188+944% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 752+944% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 6000 carries 48 GB. RTX PRO 6000 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 960 GB/s (RTX PRO 6000) — a 471.4% advantage for the RTX PRO 6000. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 384-bit on the RTX PRO 6000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 128 MB (RTX PRO 6000) — the RTX PRO 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 48 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 960 GB/s+471% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 384-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 128 MB+6300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 6000). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX PRO 6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX PRO 6000's 600W — a 158.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (RTX PRO 6000). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-88% | 600W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | 16-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 304mm |
| Height | — | 137mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+115% | 71.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the RTX PRO 6000 launched at $8565. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 98% cheaper ($8396 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.0 (RTX PRO 6000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1172% better value. The newer card here is RTX PRO 6000 (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-98% | $8565 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+1172% | 5.0 |
| Codename | GA107 | GB202 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | 2025 |
| Ranking | #252 | #608 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














