
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

T1000 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+40.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $331 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 314.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
T1000 8GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 160mm, a 4mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,674 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌195.9% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024T1000 8GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅+40.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $331 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 314.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 160mm, a 4mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,674 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌195.9% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than T1000 8GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is T1000 8GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 66 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 34 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and T1000 8GB

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

T1000 8GB
T1000 8GB
The T1000 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,674 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the T1000 8GB's 7,674 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 40.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the T1000 8GB uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 896 (T1000 8GB). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000 8GB). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1395 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+40% | 7,674 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+157% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+171% | 2.5 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+5% | 1395 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 72+29% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+161% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The T1000 8GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the T1000 8GB has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1 MB (T1000 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (T1000 8GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000 8GB). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000 8GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the T1000 8GB's 50W — a 33.3% difference. The T1000 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (T1000 8GB). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 50W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 156mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 153.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the T1000 8GB launched at $500. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 66.2% less ($331 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 15.3 (T1000 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 315.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-66% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+316% | 15.3 |
| Codename | GA107 | TU117 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #252 | #332 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












