
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Tesla K20c
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+142.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $3,030 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4490.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla K20c
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,432 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1792.9% HIGHER MSRP$3,199 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Tesla K20c
2012Why buy it
- ✅+142.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $3,030 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4490.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,432 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1792.9% HIGHER MSRP$3,199 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Tesla K20c?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla K20c still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Tesla K20c

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Tesla K20c
Tesla K20c
The Tesla K20c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Tesla K20c's 4,432 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 142.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Tesla K20c uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20c). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20c).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+143% | 4,432 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2496+8% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+92% | 3.524 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 72 | 208+189% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+1050% | 0.2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+60% | 1.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla K20c relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K20c has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20c) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+60% | 1.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 11_0 (Tesla K20c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Tesla K20c's 225W — a 105.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Tesla K20c). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-69% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+680% | 19.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Tesla K20c launched at $3199. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 94.7% less ($3030 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.4 (Tesla K20c) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 4442.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-95% | $3199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+4443% | 1.4 |
| Codename | GA107 | GK110 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | November 12 2012 |
| Ranking | #252 | #549 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












