G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅+139.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $7,530 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 10794% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Tesla K40c

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,495 vs 10,749).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
4455.6% HIGHER MSRP
$7,699 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Tesla K40c

2013

Why buy it

✅+139.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $7,530 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 10794% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,495 vs 10,749).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
4455.6% HIGHER MSRP
$7,699 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Tesla K40c?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,749 vs 4,495 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Tesla K40c is a 2013 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2013, 139.1% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 2 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is about $7,530 cheaper on MSRP at $169 MSRP versus $7,699 MSRP, and you are getting 139.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 10794%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Tesla K40c still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Tesla K40c is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $7,699 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Benchmark Check

Tesla K40c Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla K40c
1080p
low	109 FPS	110 FPS
medium	92 FPS	94 FPS
high	77 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	44 FPS
1440p
low	95 FPS	88 FPS
medium	81 FPS	76 FPS
high	59 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	30 FPS	29 FPS
medium	28 FPS	27 FPS
high	19 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	16 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Tesla K40c

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla K40c
1080p
low	174 FPS	120 FPS
medium	149 FPS	93 FPS
high	118 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	54 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	79 FPS
medium	106 FPS	55 FPS
high	83 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	30 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	32 FPS
medium	62 FPS	24 FPS
high	48 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Tesla K40c

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla K40c
1080p
low	484 FPS	202 FPS
medium	387 FPS	162 FPS
high	322 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	101 FPS
1440p
low	363 FPS	152 FPS
medium	290 FPS	121 FPS
high	242 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	242 FPS	101 FPS
medium	193 FPS	81 FPS
high	161 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Tesla K40c

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla K40c
1080p
low	243 FPS	179 FPS
medium	210 FPS	143 FPS
high	171 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	185 FPS	124 FPS
medium	166 FPS	102 FPS
high	131 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	66 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	73 FPS
medium	87 FPS	57 FPS
high	69 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	31 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Tesla K40c

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Tesla K40c

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Tesla K40c

The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Tesla K40c's 4,495 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 139.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Tesla K40c uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40c). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40c). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 876 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla K40c
G3D Mark Score	10,749+139%	4,495
Architecture	Ampere	Kepler
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2304	2880+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS+34%	5.046 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1470 MHz+68%	876 MHz
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	72	240+233%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+900%	0.23 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+33%	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla K40c relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla K40c
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K40c has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40c) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla K40c
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+200%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	96-bit+50%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+33%	1.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 11_0 (Tesla K40c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla K40c
DirectX	12 Ultimate+9%	11_0
Max Displays	4	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Tesla K40c's 245W — a 111.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Tesla K40c). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla K40c
TDP	70W-71%	245W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	267mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	153.6+739%	18.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Tesla K40c launched at $7699. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 97.8% less ($7530 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.6 (Tesla K40c) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 10500% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2013).