G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Tesla M2090 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Tesla M2090: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅+667.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $2,331 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11257.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Tesla M2090

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,400 vs 10,749).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1379.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 667.8% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 1,400), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 40nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,331 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 11257.8% (63.6 vs 0.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Tesla M2090 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Tesla M2090

The Tesla M2090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,400 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Tesla M2090's 1,400 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 667.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Tesla M2090 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 512 (Tesla M2090). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.332 TFLOPS (Tesla M2090).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla M2090
G3D Mark Score	10,749+668%	1,400
Architecture	Ampere	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	2304+350%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS+409%	1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	72+13%	64
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+130%	1 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla M2090 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla M2090
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2090 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the Tesla M2090. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla M2090) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla M2090
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+1100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	96-bit+50%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (Tesla M2090). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla M2090
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (FL 11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs CUDA,OpenCL (Tesla M2090).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla M2090
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	—
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	—
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	CUDA,OpenCL

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Tesla M2090's 250W — a 112.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Tesla M2090). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 248mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla M2090
TDP	70W-72%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	248mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	153.6+2643%	5.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Tesla M2090 launched at $2500. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 93.2% cheaper ($2331 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.6 (Tesla M2090) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 10500% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla M2090
MSRP	$169-93%	$2500
Performance per Dollar	63.6+10500%	0.6
Codename	GA107	GF110
Release	February 2 2024	July 25 2011
Ranking	#252	#530

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Search Tesla M2090 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.