
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Tesla P40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,530 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2969.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,749 vs 11,808).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Tesla P40
2016Why buy it
- ✅+9.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌3272.2% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Tesla P40
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,530 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2969.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+9.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,749 vs 11,808).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌3272.2% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla P40 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Tesla P40?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 67 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 54 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 531 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 133 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 133 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Tesla P40

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Tesla P40
Tesla P40
The Tesla P40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,808 points. Launch price was $5,699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Tesla P40's 11,808 — the Tesla P40 leads by 9.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Tesla P40 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3,840 (Tesla P40). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 11.76 TFLOPS (Tesla P40). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 11,808+10% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3840+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 11.76 TFLOPS+74% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1531 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 72 | 240+233% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+64% | 1.4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla P40 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla P40 has 24 GB. The Tesla P40 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3 MB (Tesla P40) — the Tesla P40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 24 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (Tesla P40). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla P40). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla P40).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Tesla P40's 250W — a 112.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Tesla P40). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-72% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+225% | 47.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Tesla P40 launched at $5699. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 97% less ($5530 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.1 (Tesla P40) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 2928.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-97% | $5699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+2929% | 2.1 |
| Codename | GA107 | GP102 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #252 | #227 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












