
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Tesla T10
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,831 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 913% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 260W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,749 vs 12,558).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Tesla T10
Why buy it
- ✅+16.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌1083.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌271.4% higher power demand at 260W vs 70W.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Tesla T10
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,831 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 913% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 260W, a 190W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+16.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,749 vs 12,558).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌1083.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌271.4% higher power demand at 260W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla T10 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Tesla T10?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 36 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 84 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Tesla T10

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Tesla T10
Tesla T10
The Tesla T10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Turing architecture. The boost clock speed is 1560 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,558 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Tesla T10's 12,558 — the Tesla T10 leads by 16.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Tesla T10 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,608 (Tesla T10). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 14.38 TFLOPS (Tesla T10). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 12,558+17% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4608+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 14.38 TFLOPS+112% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1560 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 72 | 288+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla T10 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla T10 has 8 GB. The Tesla T10 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (Tesla T10). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Tesla T10). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Tesla T10).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Tesla T10's 260W — a 115.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Tesla T10). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-73% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+218% | 48.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Tesla T10 launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 91.5% less ($1831 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6.3 (Tesla T10) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 909.5% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-92% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+910% | 6.3 |
| Codename | GA107 | TU102 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #252 | #213 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












