
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

TITAN RTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,330 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 691% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 280W, a 210W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅140.1% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅700% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 72).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌1378.7% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌300% higher power demand at 280W vs 70W.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,330 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 691% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 280W, a 210W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅140.1% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅700% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 72).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌1378.7% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌300% higher power demand at 280W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is TITAN RTX better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than TITAN RTX?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 66 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 307 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 86 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 904 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 723 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 478 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 226 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and TITAN RTX

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the TITAN RTX's 20,095 — the TITAN RTX leads by 86.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) with 72 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 20,095+87% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4608+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS+141% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1770 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 72 | 288+300% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 4.5 MB+96% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 72+300% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 576+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The TITAN RTX supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX has 24 GB. The TITAN RTX offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 300% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Bus width: 96-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6 MB (TITAN RTX) — the TITAN RTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 24 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 672 GB/s+300% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 384-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 120% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-75% | 280W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+114% | 71.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the TITAN RTX launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 93.2% less ($2330 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8.0 (TITAN RTX) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 695% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-93% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+695% | 8.0 |
| Codename | GA107 | TU102 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | December 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #252 | #91 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












