
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 390X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅15.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 132.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 21.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 8GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌72.3% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.6 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Radeon R9 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅15.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 132.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.3 vs 21.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 8GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌72.3% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.6 vs 50.3 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 8GB better than Radeon R9 390X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 390X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 564 FPS | 418 FPS |
| medium | 451 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 423 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 104 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 415 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Radeon R9 390X

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
The Radeon R9 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,278 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 versus the Radeon R9 390X's 9,278 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 35.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 390X uses GCN 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 390X). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390X). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535+35% | 9,278 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2816+10% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS+54% | 5.914 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+69% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 176+120% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+262% | 0.69 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 390X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon R9 390X) — a 71.4% advantage for the Radeon R9 390X. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 390X) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 384 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 512-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 390X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390X). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the Radeon R9 390X's 275W — a 71.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 750W (Radeon R9 390X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 277mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-53% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-40% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 277mm |
| Height | 112mm | 129mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C-18% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4+186% | 33.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 390X launched at $429. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 42% less ($180 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 21.6 (Radeon R9 390X) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 132.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-42% | $429 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.3+133% | 21.6 |
| Codename | GA106 | Grenada |
| Release | January 4 2022 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #211 | #287 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













