
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 175W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 6700
2021Why buy it
- ✅37.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌52.2% HIGHER MSRP$379 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌34.6% higher power demand at 175W vs 130W.
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
2022Radeon RX 6700
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 175W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅37.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌52.2% HIGHER MSRP$379 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌34.6% higher power demand at 175W vs 130W.
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6700 better than GeForce RTX 3050 8GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 8GB make more sense than Radeon RX 6700?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 223 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 66 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 564 FPS | 844 FPS |
| medium | 451 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 568 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 426 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 423 FPS | 639 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 213 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 415 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 402 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 440 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 206 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Radeon RX 6700

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon RX 6700
Radeon RX 6700
The Radeon RX 6700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,920 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 versus the Radeon RX 6700's 18,920 — the Radeon RX 6700 leads by 50.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6700 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2450 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 36 (Radeon RX 6700) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535 | 18,920+51% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS | 11.29 TFLOPS+24% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2450 MHz+38% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 144+80% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 36+80% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700 has 10 GB. The Radeon RX 6700 offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700) — a 42.9% advantage for the Radeon RX 6700. Bus width: 128-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700) — the Radeon RX 6700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 10 GB+25% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 320 GB/s+43% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 160-bit+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6700). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCE |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 6700's 175W — a 29.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 550W (Radeon RX 6700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-26% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-18% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C-12% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4 | 108.1+12% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6700 launched at $379. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 34.3% less ($130 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 49.9 (Radeon RX 6700) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 0.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-34% | $379 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.3 | 49.9 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 22 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | June 9 2021 |
| Ranking | #211 | #90 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













