
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 332.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 450W, a 380W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 336mm, a 176mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
2022Why buy it
- ✅186.3% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅366.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 72).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1082.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌542.9% higher power demand at 450W vs 70W.
- ❌110% longer card at 336mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 332.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 450W, a 380W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 336mm, a 176mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅186.3% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅366.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 72).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌1082.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌542.9% higher power demand at 450W vs 70W.
- ❌110% longer card at 336mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3090 Ti better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 98 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 745 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 608 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 423 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 571 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 317 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 204 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 929 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 677 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 586 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 719 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 589 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 438 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 299 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 878 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 807 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 710 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 647 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 700 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 640 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 560 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 466 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 417 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 331 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,395 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti's 29,395 — the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti leads by 173.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 10,752 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 40 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1860 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 84 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) with 72 Tensor cores vs 336.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 29,395+173% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 10752+367% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 40 TFLOPS+490% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1860 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 32 | 112+250% |
| TMUs | 72 | 336+367% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 10.5 MB+357% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 84+367% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 336+367% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has 24 GB. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) — a 500% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. Bus width: 96-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 24 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 1008 GB/s+500% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 384-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti's 450W — a 146.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 850W (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 336mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-84% | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-65% | 850W |
| Power Connector | None | 16-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 336mm |
| Height | — | 140mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+135% | 65.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 91.5% less ($1830 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 14.7 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 332.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-92% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+333% | 14.7 |
| Codename | GA107 | GA102 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | January 27 2022 |
| Ranking | #252 | #19 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












