GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $330 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 39.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • Draws 70W instead of 165W, a 95W reduction.
  • Measures 160mm instead of 240mm, a 80mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

2023

Why buy it

  • 133.9% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
  • More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 195.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $499 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 45.5 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • 135.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 70W.
  • 50% longer card at 240mm vs 160mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB averages 133.9% more FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 22,713 vs 10,749 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 111.3% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 16 GB instead of 6 GB, better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of DLSS Super Resolution, and a 5nm process instead of 8nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is about 195.3% more expensive on MSRP at $499 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and you are getting 133.9% more estimated average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data and 111.3% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?
Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (70W vs 165W), and staying closer to $169 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB currently gives you 111.3% higher G3D Mark and 133.9% more estimated average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
1080p
low109 FPS223 FPS
medium92 FPS208 FPS
high77 FPS182 FPS
ultra45 FPS168 FPS
1440p
low95 FPS197 FPS
medium81 FPS166 FPS
high59 FPS137 FPS
ultra34 FPS131 FPS
4K
low30 FPS138 FPS
medium28 FPS115 FPS
high19 FPS94 FPS
ultra16 FPS87 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
1080p
low174 FPS433 FPS
medium149 FPS366 FPS
high118 FPS296 FPS
ultra87 FPS241 FPS
1440p
low129 FPS279 FPS
medium106 FPS239 FPS
high83 FPS195 FPS
ultra62 FPS162 FPS
4K
low74 FPS123 FPS
medium62 FPS102 FPS
high48 FPS84 FPS
ultra34 FPS66 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
1080p
low484 FPS888 FPS
medium387 FPS716 FPS
high322 FPS628 FPS
ultra242 FPS511 FPS
1440p
low363 FPS676 FPS
medium290 FPS537 FPS
high242 FPS460 FPS
ultra181 FPS383 FPS
4K
low242 FPS458 FPS
medium193 FPS363 FPS
high161 FPS312 FPS
ultra121 FPS256 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
1080p
low243 FPS775 FPS
medium210 FPS639 FPS
high171 FPS558 FPS
ultra144 FPS492 FPS
1440p
low185 FPS613 FPS
medium166 FPS503 FPS
high131 FPS435 FPS
ultra109 FPS378 FPS
4K
low104 FPS375 FPS
medium87 FPS322 FPS
high69 FPS298 FPS
ultra55 FPS256 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's 22,713 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB leads by 111.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) with 72 Tensor cores vs 136.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
G3D Mark Score
10,749
22,713+111%
Architecture
Ampere
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
8 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2304
4352+89%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS
22.06 TFLOPS+226%
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
2535 MHz+72%
ROPs
32
48+50%
TMUs
72
136+89%
L1 Cache
2.3 MB
4.3 MB+87%
L2 Cache
2 MB
32 MB+1500%
Ray Tracing Cores
18
34+89%
Tensor Cores
72
136+89%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — a 71.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
16 GB+167%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
288 GB/s+71%
Bus Width
96-bit
128-bit+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB
32 MB+1500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Encoder
NVENC (5th Gen)
NVENC 8th gen
Decoder
NVDEC (7th Gen)
NVDEC 5th gen
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's 165W — a 80.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 160mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2.2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
TDP
70W-58%
165W
Recommended PSU
300W-45%
550W
Power Connector
None
16-pin (12VHPWR)
Length
160mm
240mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2-9%
2.2
Temp (Load)
75°C
65°C-13%
Perf/Watt
153.6+12%
137.7
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB launched at $499. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 66.1% less ($330 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 45.5 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 39.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
MSRP
$169-66%
$499
Performance per Dollar
63.6+40%
45.5
Codename
GA107
AD106
Release
February 2 2024
May 18 2023
Ranking
#252
#56