
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce RTX 4070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $430 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 304mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅117.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌254.4% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
- ❌90% longer card at 304mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 150.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) with 72 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 26,919+150% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 5888+156% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+330% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2475 MHz+68% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 184+156% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 5.8 MB+152% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 36 MB+1700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 46+156% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 184+156% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 200% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 504 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 192-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 36 MB+1700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 96.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-65% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 304mm |
| Height | — | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+14% | 134.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 71.8% cheaper ($430 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 41.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-72% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+42% | 44.9 |
| Codename | GA107 | AD104 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #32 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














