
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $430 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 304mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 8 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅156.4% more average FPS across 8 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌254.4% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
- ❌90% longer card at 304mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $430 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 304mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅156.4% more average FPS across 8 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 8 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌254.4% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
- ❌90% longer card at 304mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 58 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 101 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 884 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 277 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 751 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 272 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and GeForce RTX 4070

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 150.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) with 72 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 26,919+150% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 5888+156% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+330% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2475 MHz+68% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 184+156% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 5.8 MB+152% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 36 MB+1700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 46+156% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 184+156% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 200% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 96-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 504 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 192-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 36 MB+1700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 96.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-65% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 304mm |
| Height | — | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+14% | 134.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 71.8% less ($430 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 41.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-72% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+42% | 44.9 |
| Codename | GA107 | AD104 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












