
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 115W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅102.0% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌64.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 70W.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 115W, a 45W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅102.0% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌64.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 811 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 661 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 587 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 466 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 206 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 435 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 233 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,702 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile's 20,702 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile leads by 92.6%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,608 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 15.62 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 36 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) with 72 Tensor cores vs 144.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 20,702+93% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4608+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 15.62 TFLOPS+131% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1695 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 72 | 144+100% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 4.5 MB+96% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 36+100% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 144+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) — a 52.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 256 GB/s+52% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile's 115W — a 48.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-39% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 160mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 180.0+17% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | — |
| Codename | GA107 | AD106 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #83 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












