
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $430 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 50.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 220W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 245mm, a 85mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅144.9% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌254.4% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 50.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌214.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 70W.
- ❌53.1% longer card at 245mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $430 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 50.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 220W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 245mm, a 85mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅144.9% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌254.4% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 50.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌214.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 70W.
- ❌53.1% longer card at 245mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 58 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 317 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 110 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 711 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 695 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 455 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 321 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1980 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,958 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER's 29,958 — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER leads by 178.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7,168 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 35.48 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 56 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) with 72 Tensor cores vs 224.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 29,958+179% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 7168+211% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 35.48 TFLOPS+424% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2475 MHz+68% |
| ROPs | 32 | 80+150% |
| TMUs | 72 | 224+211% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 7 MB+204% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 56+211% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 224+211% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — a 200% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER. Bus width: 96-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 504 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 192-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER's 220W — a 103.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 160mm vs 245mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-68% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 160mm | 245mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+13% | 136.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER launched at $599. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 71.8% less ($430 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 50.0 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 27.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-72% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+27% | 50.0 |
| Codename | GA107 | AD104 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | January 8 2024 |
| Ranking | #252 | #18 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












