
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $630 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 59.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 285W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 310mm, a 150mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER across 21 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅180.8% more average FPS across 21 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌372.8% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.8 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌307.1% higher power demand at 285W vs 70W.
- ❌93.8% longer card at 310mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $630 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 59.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 285W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 310mm, a 150mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅180.8% more average FPS across 21 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER across 21 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌372.8% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.8 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌307.1% higher power demand at 285W vs 70W.
- ❌93.8% longer card at 310mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 719 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 163 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 955 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 716 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 976 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 859 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 358 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 962 FPS |
| medium | 244 FPS | 817 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 726 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 651 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 208 FPS | 753 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 630 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 483 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 341 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2340 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 8448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 66 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,828 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 31,828 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER leads by 196.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8,448 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 44.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 66 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) with 72 Tensor cores vs 264.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 31,828+196% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 8448+267% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 44.1 TFLOPS+551% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2610 MHz+78% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 72 | 264+267% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 8.3 MB+261% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 66+267% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 264+267% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — a 300% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 672 GB/s+300% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 8th gen (Dual) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 8th gen (Dual) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 285W — a 121.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 160mm vs 310mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-75% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-60% | 750W |
| Power Connector | None | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 160mm | 310mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 72°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+38% | 111.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 78.8% less ($630 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 39.8 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 59.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-79% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+60% | 39.8 |
| Codename | GA107 | AD103 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | January 8 2024 |
| Ranking | #252 | #10 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












