
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4080
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,030 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 121.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 28.7 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 320W, a 250W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 310mm, a 150mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,749 vs 34,445).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4080 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4080
2022Why buy it
- ✅+220.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌609.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.7 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌357.1% higher power demand at 320W vs 70W.
- ❌93.8% longer card at 310mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024GeForce RTX 4080
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,030 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 121.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 28.7 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 320W, a 250W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 310mm, a 150mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+220.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,749 vs 34,445).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4080 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌609.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.7 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌357.1% higher power demand at 320W vs 70W.
- ❌93.8% longer card at 310mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4080 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than GeForce RTX 4080?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 818 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 344 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 335 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 221 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 999 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 775 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 988 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 902 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 581 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 388 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 963 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 830 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 737 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 793 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 690 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 585 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 382 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and GeForce RTX 4080

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

GeForce RTX 4080
GeForce RTX 4080
The GeForce RTX 4080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2205 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 320W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34,445 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce RTX 4080's 34,445 — the GeForce RTX 4080 leads by 220.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4080 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4080). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2505 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 76 (GeForce RTX 4080) with 72 Tensor cores vs 304.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 34,445+220% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 9728+322% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 48.74 TFLOPS+620% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2505 MHz+70% |
| ROPs | 32 | 112+250% |
| TMUs | 72 | 304+322% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 9.5 MB+313% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 64 MB+3100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 76+322% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 304+322% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4080 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4080 has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4080 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 736 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4080) — a 338.1% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4080) — the GeForce RTX 4080 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 736 GB/s+338% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 64 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4080). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4080). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4080).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 4080's 320W — a 128.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 4080). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 310mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-78% | 320W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-60% | 750W |
| Power Connector | None | 16-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 310mm |
| Height | — | 140mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+43% | 107.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4080 launched at $1199. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 85.9% less ($1030 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 28.7 (GeForce RTX 4080) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 121.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-86% | $1199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+122% | 28.7 |
| Codename | GA107 | AD103 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | September 20 2022 |
| Ranking | #252 | #7 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












