
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

GeForce RTX 4080
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce RTX 4080 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce RTX 4080 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce RTX 4080: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,030 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 121.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 28.7 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 320W, a 250W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 310mm, a 150mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4080 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4080 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
GeForce RTX 4080
2022Why buy it
- ✅179.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌609.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.7 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌357.1% higher power demand at 320W vs 70W.
- ❌93.8% longer card at 310mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce RTX 4080 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

GeForce RTX 4080
The GeForce RTX 4080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2205 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 320W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34,445 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce RTX 4080's 34,445 — the GeForce RTX 4080 leads by 220.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4080 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4080). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2505 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 76 (GeForce RTX 4080) with 72 Tensor cores vs 304.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 34,445+220% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 9728+322% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 48.74 TFLOPS+620% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2505 MHz+70% |
| ROPs | 32 | 112+250% |
| TMUs | 72 | 304+322% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 9.5 MB+313% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 64 MB+3100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 76+322% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 304+322% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4080 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4080 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4080 carries 16 GB. GeForce RTX 4080 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 736 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4080) — a 338.1% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 4080. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4080) — the GeForce RTX 4080 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 736 GB/s+338% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 64 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4080). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4080). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4080).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 4080's 320W — a 128.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 4080). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 310mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-78% | 320W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-60% | 750W |
| Power Connector | None | 16-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 310mm |
| Height | — | 140mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+43% | 107.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the GeForce RTX 4080 launched at $1199. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 85.9% cheaper ($1030 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 28.7 (GeForce RTX 4080) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 121.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-86% | $1199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+122% | 28.7 |
| Codename | GA107 | AD103 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | September 20 2022 |
| Ranking | #252 | #7 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














