
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 85.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 34.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 320W, a 250W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 304mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER across 20 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅193.4% more average FPS across 20 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌491.1% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 34.2 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌357.1% higher power demand at 320W vs 70W.
- ❌90% longer card at 304mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 85.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 34.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 320W, a 250W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 304mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅193.4% more average FPS across 20 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER across 20 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌491.1% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 34.2 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌357.1% higher power demand at 320W vs 70W.
- ❌90% longer card at 304mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 108 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 851 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 535 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 651 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 363 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 236 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 999 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 770 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 988 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 902 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 770 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 577 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 385 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 878 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 770 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 846 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 733 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 639 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 550 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 385 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2295 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 10240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 320W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER's 34,215 — the GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER leads by 218.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 10,240 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 52.22 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2550 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 80 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER) with 72 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 34,215+218% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 10240+344% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 52.22 TFLOPS+671% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2550 MHz+73% |
| ROPs | 32 | 112+250% |
| TMUs | 72 | 320+344% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 10 MB+335% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 64 MB+3100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 80+344% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 320+344% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 736 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER) — a 338.1% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 736 GB/s+338% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 64 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 8th Gen (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER's 320W — a 128.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 850W (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 160mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-78% | 320W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-65% | 850W |
| Power Connector | None | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 160mm | 304mm |
| Height | — | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+44% | 106.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 83.1% less ($830 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 34.2 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 86% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-83% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+86% | 34.2 |
| Codename | GA107 | AD103 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | January 8 2024 |
| Ranking | #252 | #8 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












