
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4090 D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,430 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 231% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 19.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 425W, a 355W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 304mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 D across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4090 D is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4090 D
2023Why buy it
- ✅217.7% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌846.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,599 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.2 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌507.1% higher power demand at 425W vs 70W.
- ❌90% longer card at 304mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024GeForce RTX 4090 D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,430 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 231% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 19.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 425W, a 355W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 304mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅217.7% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 D across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4090 D is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌846.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,599 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.2 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌507.1% higher power demand at 425W vs 70W.
- ❌90% longer card at 304mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4090 D better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than GeForce RTX 4090 D?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 102 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 841 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 657 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 516 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 548 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 240 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 944 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 772 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 699 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 604 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 317 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 971 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 855 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 691 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 830 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 728 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 641 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 518 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 346 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and GeForce RTX 4090 D

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

GeForce RTX 4090 D
GeForce RTX 4090 D
The GeForce RTX 4090 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 28 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2280 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 14592 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 425W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 114 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,725 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce RTX 4090 D's 30,725 — the GeForce RTX 4090 D leads by 185.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4090 D uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 14,592 (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 73.54 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 114 (GeForce RTX 4090 D) with 72 Tensor cores vs 456.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 30,725+186% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 14592+533% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 73.54 TFLOPS+986% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2520 MHz+71% |
| ROPs | 32 | 176+450% |
| TMUs | 72 | 456+533% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 14.3 MB+522% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 72 MB+3500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 114+533% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 456+533% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 D is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4090 D supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4090 D has 24 GB. The GeForce RTX 4090 D offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090 D) — a 500% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 D. Bus width: 96-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 72 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 D) — the GeForce RTX 4090 D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 24 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 1008 GB/s+500% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 384-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 72 MB+3500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2x NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4090 D).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 2x NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 4090 D's 425W — a 143.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 850W (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 78°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-84% | 425W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-65% | 850W |
| Power Connector | None | 16-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 304mm |
| Height | — | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-4% | 78°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+112% | 72.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4090 D launched at $1599. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 89.4% less ($1430 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 19.2 (GeForce RTX 4090 D) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 231.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-89% | $1599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+231% | 19.2 |
| Codename | GA107 | AD102 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | December 28 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #14 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












