GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce2 MX 100/200
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce2 MX 100/200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce2 MX 100/200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce2 MX 100/200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅8724.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌600% higher power demand at 70W vs 10W.
GeForce2 MX 100/200
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 70W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce2 MX 100/200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
GeForce2 MX 100/200
The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce2 MX 100/200's 3 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 358200%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce2 MX 100/200 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 384 (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce2 MX 100/200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+358200% | 3 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+500% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+750% | 0.7972 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+42% | 1038 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 72+200% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+1543% | 0.14 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce2 MX 100/200 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce2 MX 100/200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce2 MX 100/200 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX 100/200. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce2 MX 100/200) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce2 MX 100/200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+1100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7.0 (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce2 MX 100/200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+71% | 7.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+283% | 1.2 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs None (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs None. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX 100/200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce2 MX 100/200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | None |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce2 MX 100/200's 10W — a 150% difference. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 165mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 55.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce2 MX 100/200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 10W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 165mm |
| Height | — | 64mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 55-27% |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+51100% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the GeForce2 MX 100/200 launched at $0. On MSRP, GeForce2 MX 100/200 was 100+% cheaper ($169 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs Infinity (GeForce2 MX 100/200) — the GeForce2 MX 100/200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce2 MX 100/200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | GA107 | GP108 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #252 | #657 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and GeForce2 MX 100/200
