GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce4 MX 4000
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce4 MX 4000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce4 MX 4000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce4 MX 4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅8724.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌180% higher power demand at 70W vs 25W.
GeForce4 MX 4000
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 70W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce4 MX 4000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
GeForce4 MX 4000
The GeForce4 MX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce4 MX 4000's 5 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 214880%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce4 MX 4000 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 896 (GeForce4 MX 4000). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 4000). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+214880% | 5 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+157% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+110% | 3.226 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1575 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 72+13% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce4 MX 4000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 4000 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 4000.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+1100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 4000). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+71% | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+207% | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs None (GeForce4 MX 4000). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 MX 4000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | MPEG-2 Decoder |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce4 MX 4000's 25W — a 94.7% difference. The GeForce4 MX 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 4000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 25W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 60°C-20% |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+76700% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the GeForce4 MX 4000 launched at $0. On MSRP, GeForce4 MX 4000 was 100+% cheaper ($169 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs Infinity (GeForce4 MX 4000) — the GeForce4 MX 4000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce4 MX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | GA107 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #252 | #523 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and GeForce4 MX 4000
