G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce4 Ti 4400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce4 Ti 4400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅8724.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 271578% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 512), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

GeForce4 Ti 4400

2022

Why buy it

✅611.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (512 vs 72).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌
76.9% HIGHER MSRP
$299 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8724.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 153457.1% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 7), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2022. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $130 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 271578% (63.6 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce4 Ti 4400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

GeForce4 Ti 4400

The GeForce4 Ti 4400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4400's 7 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 153457.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce4 Ti 4400 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 128 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) with 72 Tensor cores vs 512.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GeForce4 Ti 4400
G3D Mark Score	10,749+153457%	7
Architecture	Ampere	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2304	16384+611%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS	82.58 TFLOPS+1119%
Boost Clock	1470 MHz	2520 MHz+71%
ROPs	32	176+450%
TMUs	72	512+611%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB	16 MB+596%
L2 Cache	2 MB	72 MB+3500%
Ray Tracing Cores	18	128+611%
Tensor Cores	72	512+611%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce4 Ti 4400 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GeForce4 Ti 4400
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4400 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4400. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 72 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4400) — the GeForce4 Ti 4400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GeForce4 Ti 4400
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+1100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	96-bit+50%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	72 MB+3500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4400). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GeForce4 Ti 4400
DirectX	12 Ultimate+48%	8.1
OpenGL	4.6+254%	1.3
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs None (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 Ti 4400).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GeForce4 Ti 4400
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	None
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	MPEG-2 Decoder
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4400's 450W — a 146.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4400). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GeForce4 Ti 4400
TDP	70W-84%	450W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	216mm
Height	—	100mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C	65°C-13%
Perf/Watt	153.6	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the GeForce4 Ti 4400 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 43.5% cheaper ($130 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4400) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2022).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GeForce4 Ti 4400
MSRP	$169-43%	$299
Performance per Dollar	63.6	0.0
Codename	GA107	AD102
Release	February 2 2024	September 20 2022
Ranking	#252	#4

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Search GeForce4 Ti 4400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.