
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+95.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $131 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 246.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 18.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 15W.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 70W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,500 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌77.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
2023Why buy it
- ✅+95.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $131 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 246.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 18.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 70W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,500 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌77.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 59 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)'s 5,500 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 95.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) uses Xe LPG, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1950 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+95% | 5,500 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Xe LPG |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+57500% | 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1950 MHz+33% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+207% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs Xe Media Engine (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)'s 15W — a 129.4% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 15W-79% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 366.7+139% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) launched at $300. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 43.7% less ($131 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 18.3 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 247.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-44% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+248% | 18.3 |
| Codename | GA107 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Release | February 2 2024 | December 14 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #496 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













